http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qJOeWKgFww
So those of you Googling University of Montana FBI Investigation, know that the University of Montana President, Police and Missoula Police have known for years of the Rape Issues, and Stalking Issues as have many other authorities in Montana, including the ACLU, the Governor, the Attorney General and More. Here is my Blog on my University of Montana Stalker. I have years of hate, craigs list groups, facebook hate groups, web stats, emails to authorities and more for any REAL Investigation into the Wall of Corruption in the State of Montana that protects Rapists.
University of Montana FBI Investigation, is kind of a joke. As the FBI told me over an over they did not take any of it as a threat nor is it criminal to be on paid time at the University of Montana and start Hate Groups, email hate, cyberstalk, harass a Pro Se Defendent in a Federal Trial, and apparently it is all ok with the University of Montana President Royce Engstrom as he and the U of M Police have known for years, so has the Missoula Police, they DO Not Investigate Hate Crimes period. And this turns into Rape, Lives Ruined, Business Lost, Years of Stress and as the Kalispell Case, even Murder.
More on The University of Montana IGNORING Hate Crimes, Cyberbullying, Stalking and Threats. And Montana Judges, Cops, County Attorneys aiding and abetting. All to cover up corruption in the State of Montana. All known by the Power Elite in the State of Montana.
http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/
http://www.robinclute.com/search/label/Judge%20Robin%20Clute
http://www.berniecassidy.com/
http://www.georgecorn.com/
Friday, May 4, 2012
I have Years of Web Stats, Day in, Day Out for over Three Years. This is a Video of One Web Stat. The University of Montana FBI Investigation so many are Googling, just know the FBI has known for Years. I email them updates all the time, I have those emails of IGNORE as Well. So don't get your hopes up as to this alleged investigation actually uncovering corruption in Montana.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
So Funny, Marc Randazza and David Aman Claims I Exorted them but they both made me offers I REFUSED.
Marc Randazza offered to buy Marc Randazza.com long ago, though Kashmir Hill of Forbes has the story all wrong, and has not even seen the entire email communication between Blogger Crystal Cox and Marc Randazza nor does she know of the content of the Marc Randazza Crystal Cox phone call.
Anyway, Marc Randazza offered for the Domain Name, then he demanded, both I refused. Then Marc Randazza, to teach me a lesson, called the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to offer Testimony, a Deposition, to set me up for Extortion though I never Extorted Him. This because he was upset over me buying the Domain Name, which is certainly NOT illegal.
AFTER Marc Randazza Joined Forces with the "Bad Guys", the Plaintiff, and I, being my own attorney was given notice of Marc Randazza's Deposition to set me up, then I got upset and AFTER this, I bought several more dotcoms to prove a point, and noticing that Marc Randazza 's wife and daughter's dotcom was available, what better way to make the point of how bad he is at this "Domainer" thing, and how he is NOT the Internet Expert he Claims to Be.
See even after Marc Randazza threatened me for own his dot com and even though he defened Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , still he did not buy the dot com of his beloved, WHAT?
Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards. Was it extortion for the Glen Beck name to be purchased and used attacking Glen Back and accusing him of rape and murder? This Domain Name "implies"that a Young Girl is a "Minor" right? And it accuses a man of a Rape and Murder. This is Ok in the Eyes of Attorney Marc Randazza, but for some reason me Owning MarcRandazza.com is not, nor Owning JenniferRandazza.com and his childs name, which I bought AFTER he joined the plaintiff to PROVE and to prove Point, and I never Published that Information he did that. Popehat.com Kenneth White and Marc Randazza did that with her photo, as did Forbes Kashmir Hill. NOT ME.
Even after the threat to me for buying MarcRandazza.com, he still was to dumb to buy the dotcom of his own wife and child. I wanted to point out that he was a Fraud in his representation to Potential Clients, as I had interviewed Marc Randazza to possibly represent me, and he was so Disrespectful that I chose a better choice for me and for the Entire Blogger V. Journalist, Free Speech, First Amendment Rights Debate. I did not initiate connect with Marc Randazza, nor Him to me, we agreed to talk through the recommendation of another person, one of my Investigative Bloggers, whom was also on the call.
I never "Begged" Marc Randazza to be my Attorney, in FACT I never even asked. I simply took the call in order to feel out my options, and get more information on what I thought to be Experts in the First Amendment Bar. I had already been contacted by the Attorney I did choose and was weighing my options. And trying to learn all I could for best of for all who do what I do, so I could make the right decision on the next step for the Greater Good.
Marc Randazza, almost lost me the Attorney I wanted, because Marc Randazza told the Attorney that he represented me. This was after my Attorney had heard through others of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was representing me.
Those believing I begged him to be my Attorney are Flat Wrong, think about it, why would I do that when I already had what I deem to be the most respected First Amendment Expert. A Legal Scholar who treated me with respect and focused on the Merits of the Case and nothing petty what so ever. I chose a man who is Respectful of my Rights and Talks kind to me, treats me with dignity even if he disagrees he is respectful about it and presents a very Intelligent, Sensible reason why he may disagree.
I had already spoke to this man, and read his incredible resume (Click Here to Read).
And yes I took a call to see what Marc Randazza Had to say, to offer, and out of respect for my Investigative Blogger whom contacted him. And I took the call to explore my options, thing is we did not speak again and next thing I knew, he was telling others he represented me and I had already agreed to work with the Attorney I chose. I had to contact Marc Randazza to tell him he did not represent me and why, I will be posting that email in Full coming soon. No one sentence pulled out as Kash-Shmear Hill likes to do, instead of investigate the entire TRUTH and Real FACTS.
Keep in mind this Plaintiff that Marc Randazza decided to align with was the same Plaintiff he was negotiating with in December of 2011, on my behalf and WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Conflicts of Interest, Talking Behind the Potential Clients Back, Giving Away my Strategy, and completely disrespecting me and violating my right.
So Marc Randazza offered to buy the Domain Name, then Marc Randazza emailed and said you made your point what do you want and now he is Roaring that I extorted HIM, that is simply not true and is a Smoke Screen to cover up what he actually did to me.
Now Cut to David Aman, the Original Accuser of Extortion, and the One whom gave Forbes the infamous, false light defamatory email AFTER he had already won his case against me. See the Media Frenzy saying I am Guilty Until Never Given the Chance to be Proven Innocent, well they all got their Story from David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff. Yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney in his Frenzy to set me up for Extortion is still making me offers to Settle.
Yesterday, April 2nd 2012 David Aman, made and Offer to My Attorney to Settle. Why do this ? See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney really wants to set me up for Extortion, he recently Deposed me and it was all about setting me up and previous income instead a real asset probe which would be about future income.
Last Week David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney threatened to file another Motion to Compel with Judge Hernandez to threaten and Harass me some more, this week an offer to Settle. It is all so convoluted.
Posted Here by
Crazy Crystal Cox
aKa - the Unhinged Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox Marc Randazza WAR
Anyway, Marc Randazza offered for the Domain Name, then he demanded, both I refused. Then Marc Randazza, to teach me a lesson, called the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to offer Testimony, a Deposition, to set me up for Extortion though I never Extorted Him. This because he was upset over me buying the Domain Name, which is certainly NOT illegal.
AFTER Marc Randazza Joined Forces with the "Bad Guys", the Plaintiff, and I, being my own attorney was given notice of Marc Randazza's Deposition to set me up, then I got upset and AFTER this, I bought several more dotcoms to prove a point, and noticing that Marc Randazza 's wife and daughter's dotcom was available, what better way to make the point of how bad he is at this "Domainer" thing, and how he is NOT the Internet Expert he Claims to Be.
See even after Marc Randazza threatened me for own his dot com and even though he defened Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , still he did not buy the dot com of his beloved, WHAT?
Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards. Was it extortion for the Glen Beck name to be purchased and used attacking Glen Back and accusing him of rape and murder? This Domain Name "implies"that a Young Girl is a "Minor" right? And it accuses a man of a Rape and Murder. This is Ok in the Eyes of Attorney Marc Randazza, but for some reason me Owning MarcRandazza.com is not, nor Owning JenniferRandazza.com and his childs name, which I bought AFTER he joined the plaintiff to PROVE and to prove Point, and I never Published that Information he did that. Popehat.com Kenneth White and Marc Randazza did that with her photo, as did Forbes Kashmir Hill. NOT ME.
Even after the threat to me for buying MarcRandazza.com, he still was to dumb to buy the dotcom of his own wife and child. I wanted to point out that he was a Fraud in his representation to Potential Clients, as I had interviewed Marc Randazza to possibly represent me, and he was so Disrespectful that I chose a better choice for me and for the Entire Blogger V. Journalist, Free Speech, First Amendment Rights Debate. I did not initiate connect with Marc Randazza, nor Him to me, we agreed to talk through the recommendation of another person, one of my Investigative Bloggers, whom was also on the call.
I never "Begged" Marc Randazza to be my Attorney, in FACT I never even asked. I simply took the call in order to feel out my options, and get more information on what I thought to be Experts in the First Amendment Bar. I had already been contacted by the Attorney I did choose and was weighing my options. And trying to learn all I could for best of for all who do what I do, so I could make the right decision on the next step for the Greater Good.
Marc Randazza, almost lost me the Attorney I wanted, because Marc Randazza told the Attorney that he represented me. This was after my Attorney had heard through others of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was representing me.
Those believing I begged him to be my Attorney are Flat Wrong, think about it, why would I do that when I already had what I deem to be the most respected First Amendment Expert. A Legal Scholar who treated me with respect and focused on the Merits of the Case and nothing petty what so ever. I chose a man who is Respectful of my Rights and Talks kind to me, treats me with dignity even if he disagrees he is respectful about it and presents a very Intelligent, Sensible reason why he may disagree.
I had already spoke to this man, and read his incredible resume (Click Here to Read).
And yes I took a call to see what Marc Randazza Had to say, to offer, and out of respect for my Investigative Blogger whom contacted him. And I took the call to explore my options, thing is we did not speak again and next thing I knew, he was telling others he represented me and I had already agreed to work with the Attorney I chose. I had to contact Marc Randazza to tell him he did not represent me and why, I will be posting that email in Full coming soon. No one sentence pulled out as Kash-Shmear Hill likes to do, instead of investigate the entire TRUTH and Real FACTS.
Keep in mind this Plaintiff that Marc Randazza decided to align with was the same Plaintiff he was negotiating with in December of 2011, on my behalf and WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Conflicts of Interest, Talking Behind the Potential Clients Back, Giving Away my Strategy, and completely disrespecting me and violating my right.
So Marc Randazza offered to buy the Domain Name, then Marc Randazza emailed and said you made your point what do you want and now he is Roaring that I extorted HIM, that is simply not true and is a Smoke Screen to cover up what he actually did to me.
Now Cut to David Aman, the Original Accuser of Extortion, and the One whom gave Forbes the infamous, false light defamatory email AFTER he had already won his case against me. See the Media Frenzy saying I am Guilty Until Never Given the Chance to be Proven Innocent, well they all got their Story from David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney for the Plaintiff. Yet David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney in his Frenzy to set me up for Extortion is still making me offers to Settle.
Yesterday, April 2nd 2012 David Aman, made and Offer to My Attorney to Settle. Why do this ? See David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney really wants to set me up for Extortion, he recently Deposed me and it was all about setting me up and previous income instead a real asset probe which would be about future income.
Last Week David Aman, Tonkon Torp Attorney threatened to file another Motion to Compel with Judge Hernandez to threaten and Harass me some more, this week an offer to Settle. It is all so convoluted.
Posted Here by
Crazy Crystal Cox
aKa - the Unhinged Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal Cox Marc Randazza WAR
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Marc Randazza is "Butthurt" over Crystal Cox Blogger Rejecting him as her Counsel in the Obsidian V Cox Appeal. Marc Randazza is Butthurt because Crystal Cox was smart enough to buy Marc Randazza .com
Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher
Marc Randazza, Celebrity First Amendment Attorney, has his Panties in a Wad over Crystal Cox Blogger (Not Porn Star) rejecting him as her Attorney, and Marc Randazza, is fighting back by conspiring with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set up Blogger Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza has not done his homework on Obsidian Finance Group, or Kevin Padrick to determine if there a reason to investigate, or to believe that indeed Blogger Crystal Cox does have those Journalistic Standards or Ethics that Marc Randazza spoke of, and Questioned in our conversations.
See, Marc Randazza went to school to be a journalist, and does not seem to be interested in journalistic adventures, such as reading, or Marc Randazza would easily see that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group are in some major conflicts of interest; massive lobbying and solar tax credits issue, People in Lake County Oregon are very upset at their property rights being run over by Obsidian Finance Group, HomeStreet bank out of Washington filed an Objection to the Fees of Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, There is history of questionable behavior over the Longview Fibre Deal and Aloha Lumber, and the Oregon Trail Issues.
Marc Randazza is so upset that Blogger Crystal Cox bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza cannot see the forest for the trees. And in this Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage.
Marc Randazza’s ego is leading him around. Oh, and about the Greater Good, Marc Randazza told Crystal Cox he was impressed with her, me, for standing up for and even being willing to not file an appeal for the Greater Good if that’s what he took. Marc Randazza told blogger Crystal Cox that it was very encouraging to hear that she would choose, to not appeal if that was best for lobby efforts and the good of all Bloggers and Citizen Journalists. And yet Marc Randazza, in a pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox is now working against the First Amendment Rights of all by working with the Plaintiff’s Camp in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to set up Blogger Crystal Cox, and to throw a fit over a Domain name that he was not smart enough to buy, Marc Randazza .com .
Marc Randazza, does not seem to care who is guilty of what. All Marc Randazza can seem to see is red, because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him for being a controlling ass and making deals behind her back and telling the WORLD that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox Blogger, when clearly he did not.
So in his rage, Marc Randazza has staged a Subpoena, even though he contacted the Plaintiff and offered himself up to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a Lesson. See, Marc Randazza is working with David Aman of Tonkon Torp in attempting to silence blogger Crystal Cox who is continuing to expose; Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Obsidian Renewables, Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Judge Randall Dunn, Perkins Coie Law Firm and Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Law Firm and Tom Stilley and Susan Ford, Miller Nash Law Firm, US Bankruptcy Code Violations in the Summit Bankruptcy, and events surrounding the Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon.
Ok So What Happened? How did I, Crystal Cox Blogger begin this pissing match with Marc Randazza, Porn Star Attorney Extraordinaire?
See, after my 2.5 Million Dollar Set Up to “Attempt” to Hide the Secrets of Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp and other Big Oregon Law Firms and Corporations, well, one of my Bloggers contacted Marc Randazza and I agreed to a 3 way conversation to interview Marc Randazza, and he had agreed with my Blogger to talk with me in the possibility of taking my case.
During this call Marc Randazza said that if he took the case he would need money for a certain amount of costs and that it would be an expensive case to file appeal. He said, in a case like this he would normally charge at least $75,000. However, he was considering Pro Bono due to the Media attention I was getting, but even in that would need cost for copies and to be in a hotel in California for the appeal, if he or someone he recommended were to take the case.
Marc Randazza gave many signs during this call that Marc Randazza would most likely not represent me.
During this call Marc Randazza said he was concerned of the “record” and had to take a look at it before deciding. I said that was a responsible thing to do, he said he would look at my documents and get back to me, he did not get back to me, yet told others he represented me, more on that in a bit.
Marc Randazza told me on this call that I had “made a mess,” which I found very slamming as what I do is for the Greater Good and what I was exposing was and is on the right side of the law and certainly on the right side of the Moral Compass.
Marc Randazza saying this, let me know that he had no idea that what I did was a ‘calling,’ it was for massive change and a good thing to bring attention to this issue. Marc Randazza treated me as if I had made a “mess” and with complete disrespect. When in fact, I am creating “Media” and “Legal” attention to something that is VERY important for the Greater Good of ALL.
Marc Randazza said that he was concerned with my “Journalistic Standards”, SHOCKING isn't it, a Porn King Attorney representing folks that "Society" judges and Marc Randazza is judging and slamming my “Journalistic Standards”? Anyway this disrespectful comment led me to believe that Marc Randazza seemed to have been eating up the bad information about me, this was another sign to me that Marc Randazza was not going to represent me.
I am an Investigative Blogger. And a Very Good ONE. For Over 3 years, I have read contracts, insider emails, legal briefs, documents, LLC Agreements, Legal Filings and I listened to Audio’s of Court Sessions, watched videos of depositions and insider meetings and I interviewed, and yes took notes from the side of the Debtors, Investors, Creditors and more in the Summit Bankruptcy, deeper than any other news outlet. I have covered this story in depth and linked to lots of proof and documentation.
The Media Bloggers Association should pay close attention, as what I was doing was exposing documents, and linking to those documents, and this is what most all bloggers do. The fact that I curse, Capitalize in Odd Places and have my own "Independent Style", well that make me legally "media" as well, and it does not change the Facts. I do what ALL good Investigative Bloggers, Alternative News and Citizen Journalists Do.
Big Media wants to shut me up, so they lie about me, and for some reason Marc Randazza ate up what Big Media said about me, even though it was NOT True. Marc Randazza did not care about my side. Marc Randazza simply ran me over with his personal opinions and agenda.
Marc Randazza told me that he used to work for Big Media but now he works for bloggers and porn stars, because Marc Randazza claimed that Big Media had the agenda of creating a Monopoly so they make more money. Yet NOW Marc Randazza is working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox.
Marc Randazza told me that he would have to talk to his existing clients, such as The Media Association of Bloggers, to see if there was a conflict before deciding to represent me or not. Marc Randazza claimed he would get back to me on this. Instead, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff’s side and tried to cut a deal WITHOUT my Consent, without “getting back to me” and without discussing if he represented me, wanted to represent me or if there was a Conflict.
Meanwhile Marc Randazza, of The Media Bloggers Association (MBA) , told lots of people in the “business” that he represented Blogger Crystal Cox, yet that was NOT True. I had agreed to work with another Lawyer and this created a situation that caused me stress, and almost lost me the Lawyer I really wanted.
Did Marc Randazza have to “discuss” a conflict with the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) in any way BEFORE Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff’s side and tried to work out a deal, as if he represented me? I was told at that time by other members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was talking with the Plaintiff’s side and trying to work out some arrangement regarding money, or a change to case law. I was Pro Se for a year and I wrote over 50 Court Filed Documents myself. I was and AM in the KNOW on my Case and Marc Randazza simply left me out, as if I had no brain, no rights and with total disrespect for me, Blogger Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza simply and certainly unethically took it upon himself to contact the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian V. Cox, without my knowledge and without getting back to me on if he wanted to work with me or not, Marc Randazza simply left me hanging with time running out and was working behind my back on a deal. Is this Legal? Well it is certainly NOT Ethical and certainly shows no respect for bloggers nor the First Amendment Rights that Marc Randazza, Allegedly wants to protect.
Also on that first phone call Marc Randazza said he thought it was funny that the Plaintiff thinks they can get $2.5 Million out of me, and now Marc Randazza has offered himself up to help them get any assets they think I have and ESPECIALLY that $10 Domain Name, Marc Randazza .com, that dumb shit Marc Randazza NEVER Registered for himself. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to take Domain Names, which is my only way to make a living, and all in the name of “Constitutional Rights” What? This makes no sense and is NOT True.
Marc Randazza is Vindictive, plain and simply. He was not chosen in the BIGGEST case that the blogsphere has EVER seen regarding one blogger, and a case that will change laws and is already a world wide phenomena and that blogger, me, had the nerve to buy Marc Randazza .com and to even suggest that Marc Randazza hire her to do PR for him. Marc Randazza is so mad that Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of Marc Randazza’s EGO.
In one of Marc Randazza’s last communications to me he said “do you really want to make an enemy of me?” Marc Randazza thinks that a blogger, a woman being smarter than him is making him an enemy.
So Marc Randazza is on a mission to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson and be “Deposed” to rant about me to the Plaintiff to attempt to further quash my “Free Speech” and First Amendment Rights, and thereby affecting all BLOGGERS and Alternative Media Worldwide.
Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All. Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more.
Marc Randazza said, if I take your case then my Ethical Duty is to you, yet Marc Randazza acted as if he had taken my case, without talking to me about it, and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox.
To me, Crystal Cox, this says that Marc Randazza was already acting as my attorney, and did have an Ethical Duty to me to not disclose my stance, emails, or private conversations with him. Yet Marc Randazza contacted the “Other” side to Negotiate, and that was in December. Now Marc Randazza is using information I gave him in a Deposition that Marc Randazza is giving the "Plaintiff" to attempt to put me in my place and to take a $10 Domain Name that Marc Randazza was not smart enough to buy, and this, in my opinion, is an Ethical Breach, if not Plain Ol’ Illegal.
Last December I found out that Marc Randazza was Negotiating with the Plaintiff’s Side OF MY LEGAL CASE without my PERMISSION. I was told this by other members of the First Amendment Bar that wanted to represent me. They had heard that Marc Randazza represented me and even spoke with Marc Randazza, and he had flat out claimed to be representing me, yet Marc Randazza had not told me he was even still considering representing me, Blogger Crystal Cox. I was told by other Attorneys that I needed to let Marc Randazza know that he did not represent me, because Marc Randazza was telling everybody that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox on Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox (I have Emails and more to Prove this).
Marc Randazza has so little respect for potential clients that Marc Randazza simply does as
Marc Randazza pleases without his client’s or potential client’s knowledge.
Can I Sue Marc Randazza for trying to make a deal, acting as if he was my attorney without my consent? I certainly can file Bar Complaints in NV, CA, MA, FL, and AZ to Start.
Marc Randazza is now part of a Witch Hunt to discredit blogger Crystal Cox, in effort to protect Big Corporations such as Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, Government Oversight people such as Judge Randall Dunn and Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice and Law Firms such as Tonkon Torp, Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie.
Marc Randazza is sacrificing the Free Speech rights of ALL in Marc Randazza’s own personal Ego trip over a blogger that bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is NOT a man for the rights of Free Speech. Marc Randazza is a man for the personal EGO Trip of Marc Randazza.
So how is Marc Randazza working with the “Bad Guys” and on the Opposite Side of Free Speech?
Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to set me up. Marc Randazza is pretending to be under subpoena and pretending to have no choice, but the truth is that Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff, and Marc Randazza initiated dealing with them against me because his EGO is bent that I did not CHOOSE him and I bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is even flying to Portland to be deposed at the Tonkon Torp Law Firm. Gee I wonder whose dime this is on? And all this because they want to Silence a Blogger Exposing Corruption and to spite a Pro Se Defendant who went with a different lawyer and bought the whiny baby’s name as a dotcom.
Marc Randazza is on an Ego Trip and it affects all Bloggers, yet Marc Randazza acts as if he works for the best interest of Bloggers and for the best interest of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) .
Marc Randazza does not work for the best interest of Bloggers, nor of the Best interest of the First Amendmant. Marc Randazza is on an Ego trip for Marc Randazza and so in creating a war over a domain name that he was too dumb to buy and in being pissed off because I told him I did not want him to represent me, well now Marc Randazza is working directly against the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers.
So Who Is Marc Randazza ?
Marc Randazza , Marc John Randazza of Randazza Legal Group with offices Miami, Phoenix & Toronto. Marc Randazza is an Attorney Licensed in Arizona, Nevada, California, Massachusetts, and Florida.
Marc Randazza claims to fight for the First Amendment rights of all. Marc Randazza is an Attorney specializing in protecting porn and online gambling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza )
According to wikipedia.org, Marc Randazza’s first case was representing a fraternity at Boston University, when the brothers of that fraternity were accused of destroying a house they had rented and accused of other misconduct. Marc Randazza then began practicing in Florida as a real estate attorney. Marc Randazza seems to have started right out working for the wrong side of the law and certainly the wrong side of the law in representing drunken fraternity brother’s who seem to have destroyed some one’s property.
Marc Randazza, according to wikipedia, “Soon thereafter, moved to Orlando, Florida where his practice in First Amendment and media law expanded. He started representing defendants in SLAPP suits, pornography businesses, and protesters, in often unpopular constitutional law matters.” Marc Randazza seems to have started right out of the gate on his First Amendment Soap Box defending those seemingly on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of the moral compass. Yet Marc Randazza slams me for “Journalistic Standards” and works directly against a blogger whom he had acted as if he once worked for in this same manner. Geez, WHAT a Mess Ol’ Marc Randazza has made of all this.
Marc Randazza is a Public Figure, indeed having been in debates on Fox news and other television and having worked for Big Media as Marc Randazza told me. So why are there not more bloggers EXPOSING Marc Randazza ? Well I guess, Marc Randazza really was for blogger’s rights, until he got all BENT over Blogger Crystal Cox and decided to be part of taking down the Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers.
According to wikipedia, “"Randazza has a practice that primarily focuses on the areas of First Amendment litigation, adult entertainment, trademark and copyright litigation, and domain name arbitration disputes." So you see Marc Randazza, has to save face and punish me somehow because I am Smarter than Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza represented people in WIPO cases yet claims he does not care about my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose Law Firm out of New York, in which I Legally won the right to own the names in dispute. This is a case precedence of my Legal Right to buy Marc Randazza .com, and though Marc Randazza is some big deal in Domain Name Arbitration, Marc Randazza did not have the Brains to buy Marc Randazza dotcom.
WOW, guess all that PORN has fried ol’ Marc Randazza’s brain so he has now teamed up with the Evil David Aman of Tonkon Torp who, along with his “Plaintiff” Kevin Padrick was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy in which several insiders filed to Object to the Massive Conflicts of Interest and Outrageous Fees involving Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick
More on that at the Link Below for Now (if Links are Broken due to stolen Domain Names, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a copy of the Objection to Fees in Summit and in the Homestreet Bank Scandal involving Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, as well as other documents of those who really do and have had issue with Obsidian and Kevin Padrick )
http://www.ObjectionToFees.com/
Sure must be a low blow to the Massive Ego of Marc Randazza to have been trumped by a blogger, and a Woman. Marc Randazza is one of those classic examples of Attorneys who simply shut you up and toss you in the back seat of a legal case as if he is smarter and can handle it, which obviously Marc Randazza is not smarter then blogger Crystal Cox even if Marc Randazza is conspiring to set up Blogger Crystal Cox to protect his Ego.
According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza serves as General Counsel to Corbin Fisher, who apparently is smart enough to own their dotcom, careful though there is a warning on the home page of naked men engaging in sex acts. Guess I better not buy CorbinFisherSucks.com, though it sounds like a fun name to have, but it seems that Corbin Fisher (an Adult Media Company) is a smart company owning their own dotcom and all. Too bad Corbin Fisher’s general counsel Dickhead Marc Randazza was not so smart. I think Blogger “Crystal Cox” would make a much better General Counsel for Corbin Fisher, don’t You?
According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza has “represented a number of well-known adult entertainment companies including Kink.com, Bang Bus, and Milf Hunter. He also represents media businesses such as BME and bloggers in SLAPP suits.” So the Porn King Attorney Mark Randazza is all for Freedom of Speech, ... well EVERYTHING, except a Woman Being Smarter than Him and buying a dotcom of MarcRandazza.com. Marc Randazza can’t have that, so he is off to Portland to a Deposition of the Asset’s of Crystal Cox in order to conspire to set up Blogger Crystal Cox and teach her, me a lesson for being SMARTER than Ego Maniac Marc Randazza.
Maybe his buddy David Aman will Take the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after my Judgement and Maybe David Aman, attorney for Obsidian Finance Group, will simply GIVE the domain name Marc Randazza .com to Marc Randazza then he can STOP Crying over it.
Though Marc Randazza tells me he don’t care about WIPO, yes Marc Randazza actually said that in an email to Blogger Crystal Cox, anyway, According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza “has represented the defendant in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, a case before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filed by political commentator Glenn Beck, ...The WIPO arbitrator ruled against Beck in the case, and in favor of Randazza's client.” Yet when I told Marc Randazza that I had represented myself in a WIPO case over an Attorney’s name and won, he said he did not care. Yet it sure seems that Marc Randazza is proud of his WIPO case win, in my opinion, of course.
SO what was the Beck V. Eiland-Hall case, and just what was Marc Randazza defending as a Free Speech right? Well the Domain name in that dispute was, (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") .
Marc Randazza says I have no right to own a domain name that corresponds to his name, Geez Marc Randazza did not think that in this domain name (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") I Guess that is just those double standards of Mr. Marc Randazza popping up again.
So Marc Randazza fought for the right for his client to own the domain name, "www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" - as you see at this link http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody
Hypocrite Marc Randazza thinks it is OK for his client to buy and own a sick domain name such as that, that accuses a man of rape and murder, but it is not OK for me to own Marc Randazza .com. Seems a bit of a double standard, don't you think? It is not ok to own that kind of a domain name, it is sick, it accuses a man of rape and murder and yet is defended by Marc Randazza. That site seems to be gone now, so what happened, who bought it? What was the "pay off," the circumstance? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Marc Randazza knows all about WIPO, and Copyrights, and Intellectual Property so why not just take the Domain Name? Why get on the Bandwagon of the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to Stomp on the Free Speech Rights of All Citizen Journalists and to deliberately STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of every United States Citizen who my case, Obsidian V. Cox now represents in Free Speech Issues?
You see if Asshole Marc Randazza had a Right to take the Domain Name then he would right?
So why work with the "Bad Guys" to steal the domain name, because he wants to make a point and steal the Domain Name he was not smart enough to buy. And all with the Collateral Damage of the Rights of Free Speech of Every Blogger World Wide, and of the First Amendment Rights of Everyone, Period?
Marc Randazza thinks, as you will see in the emails, that I should have asked him before I bought Marc Randazza Dotcom, gee did his client ask Glen Beck if they could buy "GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" ? I bet NOT.
Marc Randazza is simply pissed off at a Woman who did not want to let him represent her, ME, even For Free, because he was an arrogant aggressive ass to me and because he went behind my back making deals BEFORE I even agreed to be his client. I have more respect for myself than to let a BULLY, Lying, Thug Such as Marc Randazza represent me, even if for FREE.
Marc Randazza is so mad at me for not choosing him, and at me, Blogger Crystal Cox for buying the Asshole's name as a dotcom, that Marc Randazza is making the World his Collateral Damage in a Marc Randazza pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox.
Thing is, no matter what you Pricks set me up for, the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH, the Criminal in all this REMAINS to be the Criminal, Kevin Padrick remains to be suspect of White Collar Crimes, and all those involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal will remain to have been involved, and your foul play, ethics violations and double standards will one day bite you in the ASS. As the TRUTH has a way of rising to the TOP. I have Faith.
Marc Randazza is all for Free Speech and First Amendment Rights, but only in his selfish, immoral world of what Free Speech is and that does not seem to include citizen journalists exposing corruption or Internet Marketers who are Smarter then Marc Randazza and buy his dotcom.
Marc Randazza obviously needs Internet Marketing help, so I offered it to him as I do everyone I can. It’s what I do, I would like to make money at it. Marc Randazz has his panties so wound up around his you know what, he just can’t think. So instead of defending the First Amendment and those trying to expose corruption, Marc Randazza contacts the Plaintiff to work against the Pro Se First Amendment Defendant and on the Opposite Side of First Amendment Rights. And why? Because I bought MarcRandazza.com and he was too dumb to buy it so now he wants to conspire to silence me.
Does Marc Randazza know that David Aman is alleged to be under an FBI Investigation over his connection to a man in Montana who tried to intimidate me to get me to take David Aman’s “Settlement Communication” which offered me a deal, if I commit a crime “ and just swear that people committed a crime that they did not, well then he would generously let me out of a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit, is this Legal?
See That Post Here
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/david-aman-attorney-for-plaintiff-kevin.html
And if you want to order the hearing transcript of the alleged FBI Investigation that hearing is called “Motion to Exclude Sean Boushie,” it is a matter of court record.
So what ever happens in the WAR between Crystal Cox (not a Porn Star) and Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney fighting for the rights of Porn Stars, and other Adult Entertainment First Amendment rights . . . well whatever happens, my intention on my first talk with Marc Randazza was to listen with an open mind, in the possibility of Marc Randazza representing me, and buying MarcRandazza.com, well that is just what I do, I buy the names of those who are part of stories that I come across or involve me. The domain name was available, and so I bought it. I am for hire for PR, and Search Engine Marketing, I offer that service.
Marc Randazza is a Bully, and is now working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox as Marc Randazza does not believe I have a legal right to own or to have bought MarcRandazza.com, a domain name which you would think ol’ Marc Randazza would have owned long ago.
So why hasn’t Marc Randazza simply filed a WIPO complaint if Marc Randazza has the legal right to own Marc Randazza .com ? Well you see it seems like more fun and more vindictive for Marc Randazza to work on the opposite side of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights and instead set up blogger Crystal Cox with his Good Ol’ Buddies at Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in which Marc Randazza attempted to make a deal with them, financially on my behalf BEHIND MY Back and when he did not represent me.
Yes, I am under the impression that back in December, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff to make a deal on my behalf for them to change the judgement so it would not affect the Porn Industry Free Speech, and this was to be in my best interest. And I was told that at that same time Marc Randazza claimed to many in the First Amendment Bar, that he represented me, and yet Marc Randazza had not told me, the “Alleged” Client. In my Opinion, based on my personal experience I do not recommend nor trust Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza, seems to me to work on the OPPOSITE side of Free Speech in order to teach a female investigative blogger a lesson for being smarter than him.
Marc Randazza was not offered the chance to buy Marc Randazza .com, NO WAY. He will only get the name if he files a WIPO complaint, or sucks up to Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and his Attorney David Aman, if they seize the Domain Name and give it to Marc Randazza in some deal possibly made to set up, to silence blogger Crystal Cox for exposing; Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and their connections to Oregon Solar Credits, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Judge Randall Dunn, Blue Heron Paper Company, Dept. of Justice Pamela Griffith, Perkins Coie Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Susan Ford and Tom Stilley, Miller Nash, Bonneville Power, Lake County Oregon Commissioners, the Bend Oregon D.A. Office.
Marc Randazza claims to be a Copyright Expert, so if there is a Legal Reason that Marc Randazza should get to own Marc Randazza .com that Marc Randazza was to dumb to buy, then why doesn’t big shot Domain Name Arbitration Lawyer Marc Randazza, simply TAKE Marc Randazza .com by force instead of working in the dark, in back alleys and side deals with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, which is looking to be the biggest case of Free Speech For Bloggers that the Blogsphere has ever seen in quite this way?
And if it is NOT Legal to buy Marc Randazza .com if I am not Marc Randazza, then why in the world is it Legal for Godaddy to Sell the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com?
So Liars, Thugs and Thieves, Sue Me, Set Me Up, Do what ever makes you feel better and sleep best at night. Punish me for being Smarter than you are. Still the Truth Remains the Truth, and even if you set me up from some jail time, you are still an asshole and you were still not smart enough to register your own name as dotcom. Enjoy the Game you're Playing with the First Amendment Rights of the Entire World.
You Know Your TRUTH and I know mine.
I Let Go, Let God. It will be What it will be.
Gee I hope that Randazza Legal Group owns Randazza Legal Group .com, as I won a WIPO Case for ProskauerLawFirm.com, you know what WIPO is, right Asshole?
Stay Tuned for Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Part 2 as the Pissing Match Continues. The next Part will have emails between Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Blogger and explanations of communications from my point of view, of course. This will also include my Email to Marc Randazza rejecting him in representing me because Marc Randazza is an arrogant Ass and was disrespectful to me.
Source of Information in this Article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza
And from notes of my phone call and emails with Marc Randazza and with other Attorneys of the First Amendment Barr as well as other Internet Research
Got a Tip on Marc Randazza? I would love to know.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, Crystal@CrystalCox.com,
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com
Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher
Marc Randazza, Celebrity First Amendment Attorney, has his Panties in a Wad over Crystal Cox Blogger (Not Porn Star) rejecting him as her Attorney, and Marc Randazza, is fighting back by conspiring with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to set up Blogger Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza has not done his homework on Obsidian Finance Group, or Kevin Padrick to determine if there a reason to investigate, or to believe that indeed Blogger Crystal Cox does have those Journalistic Standards or Ethics that Marc Randazza spoke of, and Questioned in our conversations.
See, Marc Randazza went to school to be a journalist, and does not seem to be interested in journalistic adventures, such as reading, or Marc Randazza would easily see that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group are in some major conflicts of interest; massive lobbying and solar tax credits issue, People in Lake County Oregon are very upset at their property rights being run over by Obsidian Finance Group, HomeStreet bank out of Washington filed an Objection to the Fees of Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group, There is history of questionable behavior over the Longview Fibre Deal and Aloha Lumber, and the Oregon Trail Issues.
Marc Randazza is so upset that Blogger Crystal Cox bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza cannot see the forest for the trees. And in this Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage.
Marc Randazza’s ego is leading him around. Oh, and about the Greater Good, Marc Randazza told Crystal Cox he was impressed with her, me, for standing up for and even being willing to not file an appeal for the Greater Good if that’s what he took. Marc Randazza told blogger Crystal Cox that it was very encouraging to hear that she would choose, to not appeal if that was best for lobby efforts and the good of all Bloggers and Citizen Journalists. And yet Marc Randazza, in a pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox is now working against the First Amendment Rights of all by working with the Plaintiff’s Camp in Obsidian V. Cox, in order to set up Blogger Crystal Cox, and to throw a fit over a Domain name that he was not smart enough to buy, Marc Randazza .com .
Marc Randazza, does not seem to care who is guilty of what. All Marc Randazza can seem to see is red, because Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him for being a controlling ass and making deals behind her back and telling the WORLD that Marc Randazza represented Crystal Cox Blogger, when clearly he did not.
So in his rage, Marc Randazza has staged a Subpoena, even though he contacted the Plaintiff and offered himself up to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a Lesson. See, Marc Randazza is working with David Aman of Tonkon Torp in attempting to silence blogger Crystal Cox who is continuing to expose; Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Obsidian Renewables, Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice, Judge Randall Dunn, Perkins Coie Law Firm and Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Law Firm and Tom Stilley and Susan Ford, Miller Nash Law Firm, US Bankruptcy Code Violations in the Summit Bankruptcy, and events surrounding the Summit Accomodators Bankruptcy based out of Bend Oregon.
Ok So What Happened? How did I, Crystal Cox Blogger begin this pissing match with Marc Randazza, Porn Star Attorney Extraordinaire?
See, after my 2.5 Million Dollar Set Up to “Attempt” to Hide the Secrets of Obsidian Finance Group, Tonkon Torp and other Big Oregon Law Firms and Corporations, well, one of my Bloggers contacted Marc Randazza and I agreed to a 3 way conversation to interview Marc Randazza, and he had agreed with my Blogger to talk with me in the possibility of taking my case.
During this call Marc Randazza said that if he took the case he would need money for a certain amount of costs and that it would be an expensive case to file appeal. He said, in a case like this he would normally charge at least $75,000. However, he was considering Pro Bono due to the Media attention I was getting, but even in that would need cost for copies and to be in a hotel in California for the appeal, if he or someone he recommended were to take the case.
Marc Randazza gave many signs during this call that Marc Randazza would most likely not represent me.
During this call Marc Randazza said he was concerned of the “record” and had to take a look at it before deciding. I said that was a responsible thing to do, he said he would look at my documents and get back to me, he did not get back to me, yet told others he represented me, more on that in a bit.
Marc Randazza told me on this call that I had “made a mess,” which I found very slamming as what I do is for the Greater Good and what I was exposing was and is on the right side of the law and certainly on the right side of the Moral Compass.
Marc Randazza saying this, let me know that he had no idea that what I did was a ‘calling,’ it was for massive change and a good thing to bring attention to this issue. Marc Randazza treated me as if I had made a “mess” and with complete disrespect. When in fact, I am creating “Media” and “Legal” attention to something that is VERY important for the Greater Good of ALL.
Marc Randazza said that he was concerned with my “Journalistic Standards”, SHOCKING isn't it, a Porn King Attorney representing folks that "Society" judges and Marc Randazza is judging and slamming my “Journalistic Standards”? Anyway this disrespectful comment led me to believe that Marc Randazza seemed to have been eating up the bad information about me, this was another sign to me that Marc Randazza was not going to represent me.
I am an Investigative Blogger. And a Very Good ONE. For Over 3 years, I have read contracts, insider emails, legal briefs, documents, LLC Agreements, Legal Filings and I listened to Audio’s of Court Sessions, watched videos of depositions and insider meetings and I interviewed, and yes took notes from the side of the Debtors, Investors, Creditors and more in the Summit Bankruptcy, deeper than any other news outlet. I have covered this story in depth and linked to lots of proof and documentation.
The Media Bloggers Association should pay close attention, as what I was doing was exposing documents, and linking to those documents, and this is what most all bloggers do. The fact that I curse, Capitalize in Odd Places and have my own "Independent Style", well that make me legally "media" as well, and it does not change the Facts. I do what ALL good Investigative Bloggers, Alternative News and Citizen Journalists Do.
Big Media wants to shut me up, so they lie about me, and for some reason Marc Randazza ate up what Big Media said about me, even though it was NOT True. Marc Randazza did not care about my side. Marc Randazza simply ran me over with his personal opinions and agenda.
Marc Randazza told me that he used to work for Big Media but now he works for bloggers and porn stars, because Marc Randazza claimed that Big Media had the agenda of creating a Monopoly so they make more money. Yet NOW Marc Randazza is working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox.
Marc Randazza told me that he would have to talk to his existing clients, such as The Media Association of Bloggers, to see if there was a conflict before deciding to represent me or not. Marc Randazza claimed he would get back to me on this. Instead, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff’s side and tried to cut a deal WITHOUT my Consent, without “getting back to me” and without discussing if he represented me, wanted to represent me or if there was a Conflict.
Meanwhile Marc Randazza, of The Media Bloggers Association (MBA) , told lots of people in the “business” that he represented Blogger Crystal Cox, yet that was NOT True. I had agreed to work with another Lawyer and this created a situation that caused me stress, and almost lost me the Lawyer I really wanted.
Did Marc Randazza have to “discuss” a conflict with the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) in any way BEFORE Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff’s side and tried to work out a deal, as if he represented me? I was told at that time by other members of the First Amendment Bar that Marc Randazza was talking with the Plaintiff’s side and trying to work out some arrangement regarding money, or a change to case law. I was Pro Se for a year and I wrote over 50 Court Filed Documents myself. I was and AM in the KNOW on my Case and Marc Randazza simply left me out, as if I had no brain, no rights and with total disrespect for me, Blogger Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza simply and certainly unethically took it upon himself to contact the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian V. Cox, without my knowledge and without getting back to me on if he wanted to work with me or not, Marc Randazza simply left me hanging with time running out and was working behind my back on a deal. Is this Legal? Well it is certainly NOT Ethical and certainly shows no respect for bloggers nor the First Amendment Rights that Marc Randazza, Allegedly wants to protect.
Also on that first phone call Marc Randazza said he thought it was funny that the Plaintiff thinks they can get $2.5 Million out of me, and now Marc Randazza has offered himself up to help them get any assets they think I have and ESPECIALLY that $10 Domain Name, Marc Randazza .com, that dumb shit Marc Randazza NEVER Registered for himself. Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to take Domain Names, which is my only way to make a living, and all in the name of “Constitutional Rights” What? This makes no sense and is NOT True.
Marc Randazza is Vindictive, plain and simply. He was not chosen in the BIGGEST case that the blogsphere has EVER seen regarding one blogger, and a case that will change laws and is already a world wide phenomena and that blogger, me, had the nerve to buy Marc Randazza .com and to even suggest that Marc Randazza hire her to do PR for him. Marc Randazza is so mad that Marc Randazza is making ALL Bloggers the Collateral Damage of Marc Randazza’s EGO.
In one of Marc Randazza’s last communications to me he said “do you really want to make an enemy of me?” Marc Randazza thinks that a blogger, a woman being smarter than him is making him an enemy.
So Marc Randazza is on a mission to teach Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson and be “Deposed” to rant about me to the Plaintiff to attempt to further quash my “Free Speech” and First Amendment Rights, and thereby affecting all BLOGGERS and Alternative Media Worldwide.
Marc Randazza told me that if I appeal it MAY create Bad Law and that maybe I should consider NOT appealing so that my case can be used to Lobby for others in changing laws. I was in agreement, and told Marc Randazza that I simply wanted advice from those surrounding the First Amendment Rights Issue and the First Amendment Bar, so that I could do what was best for all Bloggers, Citizens Journalists and the First Amendment Rights of All. Marc Randazza said he was very glad to hear that, and it made him want to work with me even more.
Marc Randazza said, if I take your case then my Ethical Duty is to you, yet Marc Randazza acted as if he had taken my case, without talking to me about it, and was already negotiating with the Plaintiff’s side of Obsidian Finance Group Vs. Blogger Crystal Cox.
To me, Crystal Cox, this says that Marc Randazza was already acting as my attorney, and did have an Ethical Duty to me to not disclose my stance, emails, or private conversations with him. Yet Marc Randazza contacted the “Other” side to Negotiate, and that was in December. Now Marc Randazza is using information I gave him in a Deposition that Marc Randazza is giving the "Plaintiff" to attempt to put me in my place and to take a $10 Domain Name that Marc Randazza was not smart enough to buy, and this, in my opinion, is an Ethical Breach, if not Plain Ol’ Illegal.
Last December I found out that Marc Randazza was Negotiating with the Plaintiff’s Side OF MY LEGAL CASE without my PERMISSION. I was told this by other members of the First Amendment Bar that wanted to represent me. They had heard that Marc Randazza represented me and even spoke with Marc Randazza, and he had flat out claimed to be representing me, yet Marc Randazza had not told me he was even still considering representing me, Blogger Crystal Cox. I was told by other Attorneys that I needed to let Marc Randazza know that he did not represent me, because Marc Randazza was telling everybody that he did represent Blogger Crystal Cox on Appeal of Obsidian V. Cox (I have Emails and more to Prove this).
Marc Randazza has so little respect for potential clients that Marc Randazza simply does as
Marc Randazza pleases without his client’s or potential client’s knowledge.
Can I Sue Marc Randazza for trying to make a deal, acting as if he was my attorney without my consent? I certainly can file Bar Complaints in NV, CA, MA, FL, and AZ to Start.
Marc Randazza is now part of a Witch Hunt to discredit blogger Crystal Cox, in effort to protect Big Corporations such as Obsidian Finance Group, Pacific Power, Government Oversight people such as Judge Randall Dunn and Pamela Griffith of the Department of Justice and Law Firms such as Tonkon Torp, Sussman Shank and Perkins Coie.
Marc Randazza is sacrificing the Free Speech rights of ALL in Marc Randazza’s own personal Ego trip over a blogger that bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is NOT a man for the rights of Free Speech. Marc Randazza is a man for the personal EGO Trip of Marc Randazza.
So how is Marc Randazza working with the “Bad Guys” and on the Opposite Side of Free Speech?
Marc Randazza is helping the Plaintiff to set me up. Marc Randazza is pretending to be under subpoena and pretending to have no choice, but the truth is that Marc Randazza called the Plaintiff, and Marc Randazza initiated dealing with them against me because his EGO is bent that I did not CHOOSE him and I bought Marc Randazza .com. Marc Randazza is even flying to Portland to be deposed at the Tonkon Torp Law Firm. Gee I wonder whose dime this is on? And all this because they want to Silence a Blogger Exposing Corruption and to spite a Pro Se Defendant who went with a different lawyer and bought the whiny baby’s name as a dotcom.
Marc Randazza is on an Ego Trip and it affects all Bloggers, yet Marc Randazza acts as if he works for the best interest of Bloggers and for the best interest of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) .
Marc Randazza does not work for the best interest of Bloggers, nor of the Best interest of the First Amendmant. Marc Randazza is on an Ego trip for Marc Randazza and so in creating a war over a domain name that he was too dumb to buy and in being pissed off because I told him I did not want him to represent me, well now Marc Randazza is working directly against the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of All Bloggers.
So Who Is Marc Randazza ?
Marc Randazza , Marc John Randazza of Randazza Legal Group with offices Miami, Phoenix & Toronto. Marc Randazza is an Attorney Licensed in Arizona, Nevada, California, Massachusetts, and Florida.
Marc Randazza claims to fight for the First Amendment rights of all. Marc Randazza is an Attorney specializing in protecting porn and online gambling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza )
According to wikipedia.org, Marc Randazza’s first case was representing a fraternity at Boston University, when the brothers of that fraternity were accused of destroying a house they had rented and accused of other misconduct. Marc Randazza then began practicing in Florida as a real estate attorney. Marc Randazza seems to have started right out working for the wrong side of the law and certainly the wrong side of the law in representing drunken fraternity brother’s who seem to have destroyed some one’s property.
Marc Randazza, according to wikipedia, “Soon thereafter, moved to Orlando, Florida where his practice in First Amendment and media law expanded. He started representing defendants in SLAPP suits, pornography businesses, and protesters, in often unpopular constitutional law matters.” Marc Randazza seems to have started right out of the gate on his First Amendment Soap Box defending those seemingly on the wrong side of the law and the wrong side of the moral compass. Yet Marc Randazza slams me for “Journalistic Standards” and works directly against a blogger whom he had acted as if he once worked for in this same manner. Geez, WHAT a Mess Ol’ Marc Randazza has made of all this.
Marc Randazza is a Public Figure, indeed having been in debates on Fox news and other television and having worked for Big Media as Marc Randazza told me. So why are there not more bloggers EXPOSING Marc Randazza ? Well I guess, Marc Randazza really was for blogger’s rights, until he got all BENT over Blogger Crystal Cox and decided to be part of taking down the Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers.
According to wikipedia, “"Randazza has a practice that primarily focuses on the areas of First Amendment litigation, adult entertainment, trademark and copyright litigation, and domain name arbitration disputes." So you see Marc Randazza, has to save face and punish me somehow because I am Smarter than Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza represented people in WIPO cases yet claims he does not care about my WIPO case with Proskauer Rose Law Firm out of New York, in which I Legally won the right to own the names in dispute. This is a case precedence of my Legal Right to buy Marc Randazza .com, and though Marc Randazza is some big deal in Domain Name Arbitration, Marc Randazza did not have the Brains to buy Marc Randazza dotcom.
WOW, guess all that PORN has fried ol’ Marc Randazza’s brain so he has now teamed up with the Evil David Aman of Tonkon Torp who, along with his “Plaintiff” Kevin Padrick was involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal and named in the Objection to Fees in the Summit Bankruptcy in which several insiders filed to Object to the Massive Conflicts of Interest and Outrageous Fees involving Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Kevin Padrick
More on that at the Link Below for Now (if Links are Broken due to stolen Domain Names, email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com for a copy of the Objection to Fees in Summit and in the Homestreet Bank Scandal involving Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, as well as other documents of those who really do and have had issue with Obsidian and Kevin Padrick )
http://www.ObjectionToFees.com/
Sure must be a low blow to the Massive Ego of Marc Randazza to have been trumped by a blogger, and a Woman. Marc Randazza is one of those classic examples of Attorneys who simply shut you up and toss you in the back seat of a legal case as if he is smarter and can handle it, which obviously Marc Randazza is not smarter then blogger Crystal Cox even if Marc Randazza is conspiring to set up Blogger Crystal Cox to protect his Ego.
According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza serves as General Counsel to Corbin Fisher, who apparently is smart enough to own their dotcom, careful though there is a warning on the home page of naked men engaging in sex acts. Guess I better not buy CorbinFisherSucks.com, though it sounds like a fun name to have, but it seems that Corbin Fisher (an Adult Media Company) is a smart company owning their own dotcom and all. Too bad Corbin Fisher’s general counsel Dickhead Marc Randazza was not so smart. I think Blogger “Crystal Cox” would make a much better General Counsel for Corbin Fisher, don’t You?
According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza has “represented a number of well-known adult entertainment companies including Kink.com, Bang Bus, and Milf Hunter. He also represents media businesses such as BME and bloggers in SLAPP suits.” So the Porn King Attorney Mark Randazza is all for Freedom of Speech, ... well EVERYTHING, except a Woman Being Smarter than Him and buying a dotcom of MarcRandazza.com. Marc Randazza can’t have that, so he is off to Portland to a Deposition of the Asset’s of Crystal Cox in order to conspire to set up Blogger Crystal Cox and teach her, me a lesson for being SMARTER than Ego Maniac Marc Randazza.
Maybe his buddy David Aman will Take the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after my Judgement and Maybe David Aman, attorney for Obsidian Finance Group, will simply GIVE the domain name Marc Randazza .com to Marc Randazza then he can STOP Crying over it.
Though Marc Randazza tells me he don’t care about WIPO, yes Marc Randazza actually said that in an email to Blogger Crystal Cox, anyway, According to wikipedia, Marc Randazza “has represented the defendant in Beck v. Eiland-Hall, a case before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filed by political commentator Glenn Beck, ...The WIPO arbitrator ruled against Beck in the case, and in favor of Randazza's client.” Yet when I told Marc Randazza that I had represented myself in a WIPO case over an Attorney’s name and won, he said he did not care. Yet it sure seems that Marc Randazza is proud of his WIPO case win, in my opinion, of course.
SO what was the Beck V. Eiland-Hall case, and just what was Marc Randazza defending as a Free Speech right? Well the Domain name in that dispute was, (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") .
Marc Randazza says I have no right to own a domain name that corresponds to his name, Geez Marc Randazza did not think that in this domain name (www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com") I Guess that is just those double standards of Mr. Marc Randazza popping up again.
So Marc Randazza fought for the right for his client to own the domain name, "www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" - as you see at this link http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody
Hypocrite Marc Randazza thinks it is OK for his client to buy and own a sick domain name such as that, that accuses a man of rape and murder, but it is not OK for me to own Marc Randazza .com. Seems a bit of a double standard, don't you think? It is not ok to own that kind of a domain name, it is sick, it accuses a man of rape and murder and yet is defended by Marc Randazza. That site seems to be gone now, so what happened, who bought it? What was the "pay off," the circumstance? Got a Tip? SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com
Marc Randazza knows all about WIPO, and Copyrights, and Intellectual Property so why not just take the Domain Name? Why get on the Bandwagon of the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to Stomp on the Free Speech Rights of All Citizen Journalists and to deliberately STOMP on the First Amendment Rights of every United States Citizen who my case, Obsidian V. Cox now represents in Free Speech Issues?
You see if Asshole Marc Randazza had a Right to take the Domain Name then he would right?
So why work with the "Bad Guys" to steal the domain name, because he wants to make a point and steal the Domain Name he was not smart enough to buy. And all with the Collateral Damage of the Rights of Free Speech of Every Blogger World Wide, and of the First Amendment Rights of Everyone, Period?
Marc Randazza thinks, as you will see in the emails, that I should have asked him before I bought Marc Randazza Dotcom, gee did his client ask Glen Beck if they could buy "GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" ? I bet NOT.
Marc Randazza is simply pissed off at a Woman who did not want to let him represent her, ME, even For Free, because he was an arrogant aggressive ass to me and because he went behind my back making deals BEFORE I even agreed to be his client. I have more respect for myself than to let a BULLY, Lying, Thug Such as Marc Randazza represent me, even if for FREE.
Marc Randazza is so mad at me for not choosing him, and at me, Blogger Crystal Cox for buying the Asshole's name as a dotcom, that Marc Randazza is making the World his Collateral Damage in a Marc Randazza pissing match with Blogger Crystal Cox.
Thing is, no matter what you Pricks set me up for, the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH, the Criminal in all this REMAINS to be the Criminal, Kevin Padrick remains to be suspect of White Collar Crimes, and all those involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal will remain to have been involved, and your foul play, ethics violations and double standards will one day bite you in the ASS. As the TRUTH has a way of rising to the TOP. I have Faith.
Marc Randazza is all for Free Speech and First Amendment Rights, but only in his selfish, immoral world of what Free Speech is and that does not seem to include citizen journalists exposing corruption or Internet Marketers who are Smarter then Marc Randazza and buy his dotcom.
Marc Randazza obviously needs Internet Marketing help, so I offered it to him as I do everyone I can. It’s what I do, I would like to make money at it. Marc Randazz has his panties so wound up around his you know what, he just can’t think. So instead of defending the First Amendment and those trying to expose corruption, Marc Randazza contacts the Plaintiff to work against the Pro Se First Amendment Defendant and on the Opposite Side of First Amendment Rights. And why? Because I bought MarcRandazza.com and he was too dumb to buy it so now he wants to conspire to silence me.
Does Marc Randazza know that David Aman is alleged to be under an FBI Investigation over his connection to a man in Montana who tried to intimidate me to get me to take David Aman’s “Settlement Communication” which offered me a deal, if I commit a crime “ and just swear that people committed a crime that they did not, well then he would generously let me out of a 10 Million Dollar Lawsuit, is this Legal?
See That Post Here
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/david-aman-attorney-for-plaintiff-kevin.html
And if you want to order the hearing transcript of the alleged FBI Investigation that hearing is called “Motion to Exclude Sean Boushie,” it is a matter of court record.
So what ever happens in the WAR between Crystal Cox (not a Porn Star) and Marc Randazza, First Amendment Attorney fighting for the rights of Porn Stars, and other Adult Entertainment First Amendment rights . . . well whatever happens, my intention on my first talk with Marc Randazza was to listen with an open mind, in the possibility of Marc Randazza representing me, and buying MarcRandazza.com, well that is just what I do, I buy the names of those who are part of stories that I come across or involve me. The domain name was available, and so I bought it. I am for hire for PR, and Search Engine Marketing, I offer that service.
Marc Randazza is a Bully, and is now working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox as Marc Randazza does not believe I have a legal right to own or to have bought MarcRandazza.com, a domain name which you would think ol’ Marc Randazza would have owned long ago.
So why hasn’t Marc Randazza simply filed a WIPO complaint if Marc Randazza has the legal right to own Marc Randazza .com ? Well you see it seems like more fun and more vindictive for Marc Randazza to work on the opposite side of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights and instead set up blogger Crystal Cox with his Good Ol’ Buddies at Tonkon Torp and Obsidian Finance Group in which Marc Randazza attempted to make a deal with them, financially on my behalf BEHIND MY Back and when he did not represent me.
Yes, I am under the impression that back in December, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff to make a deal on my behalf for them to change the judgement so it would not affect the Porn Industry Free Speech, and this was to be in my best interest. And I was told that at that same time Marc Randazza claimed to many in the First Amendment Bar, that he represented me, and yet Marc Randazza had not told me, the “Alleged” Client. In my Opinion, based on my personal experience I do not recommend nor trust Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza, seems to me to work on the OPPOSITE side of Free Speech in order to teach a female investigative blogger a lesson for being smarter than him.
Marc Randazza was not offered the chance to buy Marc Randazza .com, NO WAY. He will only get the name if he files a WIPO complaint, or sucks up to Plaintiff Kevin Padrick and his Attorney David Aman, if they seize the Domain Name and give it to Marc Randazza in some deal possibly made to set up, to silence blogger Crystal Cox for exposing; Tonkon Torp Law Firm, Obsidian Finance Group and their connections to Oregon Solar Credits, PacifiCorp, Pacific Power, Judge Randall Dunn, Blue Heron Paper Company, Dept. of Justice Pamela Griffith, Perkins Coie Steven Hedberg, Sussman Shank Susan Ford and Tom Stilley, Miller Nash, Bonneville Power, Lake County Oregon Commissioners, the Bend Oregon D.A. Office.
Marc Randazza claims to be a Copyright Expert, so if there is a Legal Reason that Marc Randazza should get to own Marc Randazza .com that Marc Randazza was to dumb to buy, then why doesn’t big shot Domain Name Arbitration Lawyer Marc Randazza, simply TAKE Marc Randazza .com by force instead of working in the dark, in back alleys and side deals with the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox, which is looking to be the biggest case of Free Speech For Bloggers that the Blogsphere has ever seen in quite this way?
And if it is NOT Legal to buy Marc Randazza .com if I am not Marc Randazza, then why in the world is it Legal for Godaddy to Sell the Domain Name Marc Randazza .com?
So Liars, Thugs and Thieves, Sue Me, Set Me Up, Do what ever makes you feel better and sleep best at night. Punish me for being Smarter than you are. Still the Truth Remains the Truth, and even if you set me up from some jail time, you are still an asshole and you were still not smart enough to register your own name as dotcom. Enjoy the Game you're Playing with the First Amendment Rights of the Entire World.
You Know Your TRUTH and I know mine.
I Let Go, Let God. It will be What it will be.
Gee I hope that Randazza Legal Group owns Randazza Legal Group .com, as I won a WIPO Case for ProskauerLawFirm.com, you know what WIPO is, right Asshole?
Stay Tuned for Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza Part 2 as the Pissing Match Continues. The next Part will have emails between Marc Randazza and Crystal Cox Blogger and explanations of communications from my point of view, of course. This will also include my Email to Marc Randazza rejecting him in representing me because Marc Randazza is an arrogant Ass and was disrespectful to me.
Source of Information in this Article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Randazza
And from notes of my phone call and emails with Marc Randazza and with other Attorneys of the First Amendment Barr as well as other Internet Research
Got a Tip on Marc Randazza? I would love to know.
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com, Crystal@CrystalCox.com,
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com
Marc Randazza Corbin Fisher
Friday, February 17, 2012
David Carr of the New York Times pretending to do investigative reporting, yet David Carr LIES, turns victims into criminals. And my Guess is the Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg story is not Different. David Carr is a PROVEN Liar, and has No accountability for his LIES.
This is Ridiculous, you Shouldn't Lie to David Carr, what a Crock of Shit that Is.
David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.
I will Soon Sue David Carr for Defamation and So Should Greg Osberg. As David Carr spoke to me, and knew the other side to the story, and though I already was served up a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement and plenty of hate, David Carr of the New York Times served me up some more by deliberately defaming me, all to protect corporate greed and the abuse of government programs at the taxpayers expense. Why trash an investigative blogger doing what he does, talking to sources and posting a story?
I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.
Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.
Here is the Article:
"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"
"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.
New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”
Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.
Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.
Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”
"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”
Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.
“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”
Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:
I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.
What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.
Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.
“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”
“I was angry.”
Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/
David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?
I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courts. David Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news. I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.
David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.
David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts. David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.
"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?
The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof. David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.
*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"
Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof. David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.
Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.
David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.
Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.
See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.
DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.
David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.
David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.
David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.
I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one. Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.
Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.
See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say. David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.
I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.
Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.
David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.
Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.
David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story. I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.
Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.
Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.
David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.
Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...
Do your Homework.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.douglaschey.com/
David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.
Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.
David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
David Carr Flat Out Lies, Sides with Criminals, Does not have one objective part in his stories and my guess is that David Carr is on the wrong side of the law and the WRONG side of the Moral Compass in this one as well.
 |
| David Carr is the Pencil Neck on the Left |
I guess David Carr does not have much stomach for investigative bloggers as David Carr does not have a clue how to investigate a story and David Carr simply listens to the yammers of alleged spineless, ball-less, nameless sources instead of reading documents, reading contracts and looking at the real proof of the story that does not come from the mouth of the SIDE that Dave Carr of the New York Times Decides to take.
Below is from the Jim Romenesko Blog - The Title Really Got me as David Carr is a Liar, I told David Carr the TRUTH and he Printed the LIE. So it does not matter what you tell David Carr of the New York Times, David Carr will twist the TRUTH, the Documented Facts to support his own lying agenda and to keep the wall of corruption firmly in place.
Here is the Article:
"YOU SHOULDN’T LIE TO DAVID CARR AND NYT"
"....Amy Chozick and David Carr’s New York Times story on the Philadelphia newspapers saga.
New York Times reporters David Carr and Amy Chozick started working on their Philadelphia newspapers story on Sunday, and heard “persistent reports” of a meeting taking place during which Philadelphia Media Network CEO Greg Osberg told editors that he’d be overseeing articles about the impending sale of the Inquirer and Daily News."
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct and he was also trying to keep his boss’s exposure sort of at a minimum. I knew Osberg from his time at Newsweek and had always had good dealings with him. I heard some bad things [from Philadelphia sources], but I had an open mind about talking with him.”
 |
| David Carr, New York Times |
By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story. “So that was one of my first questions [to Osberg]: ‘Did you hold the meeting with the three editors?’ and he said no. I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”
Again, Osberg denied there was meeting.
Just before ending the interview, Carr gave Osberg yet another opportunity to admit that the meeting took place. He wouldn’t do it.
Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”
"Later Wednesday afternoon, Philadelphia Daily News editor Larry Platt said on the record that the meeting took place. “He wouldn’t go into details,” says Carr, “but those we already had.”
Carr then told Block in an email that Platt confirmed the meeting that Osberg said never took place.
“He said, ‘What time are you closing?’ I said 7:30, and so at 7:50 he sent me a 200-word statement from Osberg acknowledging that the meeting had taken place.”
Here is Osberg’s statement to the Times reporters, time-stamped 7:56 p.m.:
I made it very clear in this February 7 meeting, that I was not suggesting ever taking control of the editorial process, nor was I planning to change any reporting policies going forward. Any suggestions to the contrary of that position are categorically denied, as I stated to you during our interview this morning.
What I did tell the editors that attended this meeting is that I would like to be advised before any articles are published on the subject of Philadelphia Media Network’s possible sale, so that as Publisher, I would not be blind-sided by a story publicly, without receiving advance notice. In view of the sensitive subject matter of the sale, as Publisher, I would have the prerogative to make such a request and it would not be uncommon to receive such notification.
Carr called the desk — after his deadline — and told editors about the statement. They were able to add a sentence to the story.
“It made me angry,” says the reporter. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been through something like that before: No, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; no, it didn’t happen; and then, yes it did.”
“I was angry.”
Source of David Carr Gibberish.
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/02/16/you-shouldnt-lie-to-david-carr-and-nyt/
David Carr was angry? Who gives a Shit?
I show 3 years of possible corruption and David Carr is so blind to the real story that he does not investigate any part of it and instead discriminates against a female blogger whom was exposing corruption in the US bankruptcy courts. David Carr has no right to say I am angry, and all the other cock and bull David Carr is blathering as news. I am the One who should be angry and so should the other victims of David Carr's Lies. As he has ruined lives with no remorse and acts angry over this, what a crock. David Carr does NOT investigate a story and David Carr listens to the yammer of sources such as liar Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and his attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp BOTH of whom were involved in the Summit Bankruptcy Scandal. Which David Carr did not even bother to look into.
David Carr, "heard “persistent reports” What? that sure sounds full of shit, I gave David Carr leads to documented proof on my story. David Carr of the New York Times Sure seems to believe the scuddle, the persistent voices of non-authority over documented proof. David Carr of the New York Times is an idiot at best.
David Carr Bullshit Regarding the Greg Osberg Scandal
"“I got in touch with [PMN spokesman] Mark Block on Tuesday,” Carr says in a phone interview. “He was spinning some, but he was helpful and direct" Says the Article above, what a Crock this is .. David Carr spins and spins and turns victims into criminals with out ANY reading of documented facts. David Carr is so full of shit, I was "helpful and direct" and honest, and David Carr of the New York Times Flat out Lied about me. David Carr is a classic case of you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As David Carr is shown proof, documentation and still goes with the LIE over the Documented Evidence.
"By Wednesday morning, Chozick and Carr had multiple sources confirming Osberg’s meeting with editors, and the two knew they were going to use it in their story.." Again what a bunch of bullshit, multiple "sources", I gave David Carr leads to documented proof and David Carr uses the blathering of alleged facts from the mouths of supposed "multiple sources" to ruin this guys reputation, and in the name of what? protecting whom?
The article goes on to say "I said, ‘You know this is going to be in the newspaper, so I’m going to give you one freebie. I’m going to give you a chance to amend that answer.’”", I say what a Fuck Head David Carr is, one chance to amend your answer, then he will ruin your life with no proof. David Carr is a lying asshole, with agendas that are NOT of the Public Interest. Do not ever TRUST getting your news from the LIES of David Carr.
*"Carr says: “I asked Amy afterwards, ‘Do you think he choked? Why did he do that?’ We really couldn’t figure it out because word of that meeting was all over the building.”"
Gossip and Blather, that's news to the Lying alleged "Journalist" David Carr of the New York Times, office clatter is NEWS to ex druggies like David Carr who cannot read documented proof. David Carr relies on gossip and word of mouth for his story, and David Carr refuses to READ and investigate FACTS.
Documentation, Depositions, Videos, Contracts, Tax Information, and more were available regarding the Truth about Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, but instead of looking into the story David Carr of the New York Times simply trashed me, lied about me and though word, documented word was all over the WORLD regarding Kevin Padrick, David Carr simply took his side over Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and chose to defame her, me, without investigating easy to read documented proof.
David Carr flat out LIED saying that there was no one else who had issue with Obsidian Finance Group or Kevin Padrick and that seems to be protected by Law. I expose real corruption and tell the TRUTH and am not protected by Law as media, but David Carr of the New York Times, flat out lies, KNOWINGLY about me, Crystal Cox Blogger and there is no protection for me, as the Law protects the LIES of David Carr. Gee.. um I snorted to much cocaine and really believed my source.. your honor.. wa la no accountability for Dipshit David Carr to ruin lives, careers and run amok.
Let's See one of the worlds biggest Law Firms, a Billion Dollar Solar and Finance company sues a penniless blogger and Dumb Ass David Carr does not look into the Financial Companies and Lawyers but instead lets my clients, family, friends and the world believe I am an extortionist, that I attacked an innocent many with the power of my blogs and David Carr lied flat out claiming he looked into it and there was no other issues with this man, Kevin Padrick. All flat out lies, meanwhile EVIL David Carr is using the power of his voice at the New York Times to to ruin lives, families, careers, quality of life, credibility and without really reading documents or studying anything but simply listening the yammer across is phone heard through the woman hating, prejudices, discriminated, biased ears of New York Times Ignorant Reporter David Carr.
See David Carr took the Word Of Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group. David Carr interviewed me himself and did not print my side. This article talks of several sources that told David Carr of a secret meeting? Does Dave Carr of the NYT's have to name all these sources? See I had 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts and more and David Carr of the New York Times took this Evidence and told his readers that there was no reason for what I wrote about Kevin Padrick. David Carr defamed me, on purpose, after talking to me. With 3 years of documented sources, depositions, videos, court cases, videos of Kevin Padrick at meetings, news articles, tax documents, contracts available online, David Carr flat out lied to protect Kevin Padrick by saying the Truth Wins, and saying there was no one else with issue with Kevin Padrick when you can easily read that there is plenty of documentation to prove that my story had 3 years worth of merit.
DO not Trust David Carr of the New York Times and his Secret Sources, as David Carr Flat Out Lies to protect criminals and has no investigative skills.
David Carr of the New York Times talked about my writings on my home town of Lincoln County Montana, and my Montana corruption writings and instead of looking into a massive wall of corruption in Montana that involves the top politicians and drug companies in the world, David Carr simply slammed an investigative blogger reporting on the story.
David Carr trash talks my writings exposing Proskauer Rose Law Firm and Ex Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye yet David Carr does not look into massive amounts of documented proof.
David Carr trash talks my stories of Time Warner CEO Jeffrey Bewkes and of CEO of Intel Paul Otellini yet David Car refuses to investigated the documented proof.
I have not dug into the Greg Osberg story as I am swamped right now. However, I am betting that David Carr is the Asshole in this one. Seems like a petty story, that is regarding the career of David Carr and personal issues to me. Yet David Carr ignores a story such as the many I write on that affect the public at large in a very real way.
Do you have a tip on the David Carr smackdown of Greg Osberg? What is the Truth about Greg Osberg, my guess is the Truth is the Exact opposite of what lying asshole David Carr suggest. As I personally told David Carr the TRUTH in my case and David Carr lied to the world about me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox. David Carr of the New York Times used his power, not for the good to investigate corruption in the New York Courts that I Blog about, not write on the SEC Corruption I post on, not to investigate the massively corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm or the whitewashing in the New York Justice System, not to Investigate the iViewit Stolen Technology, nor to look into the real story of Lightsquared, Philip Falcone and those who set him up to keep Clearwire and Verizon in Business.
See David Carr of the New York Times is a Spineless, Ball-Less Ex Cocaine Head, who cannot think for himself and instead let's big money tell him what to say. David Carr of the New York Times does not have the authority to speak the Truth, for David Carr of the New York Times is a whipping boy for big media and to protect the wall of corruption that big media like the New York Time protects.
I, Crystal Cox Blogger am TRULY independent, I get tips daily because I am very good at search engine placement. I read documents and investigate stories in a way that Spineless, Asshole David Carr of the New York Times simply cannot because he has a BOSS, he has Ad Dollars, Politics and Big Media to Answer to and I answer to NO One.
Expose the Lying, Life Ruining Weasel David Carr - Email me all the DIRT, documents, videos and indescresions. As David Carr of the New York Times, thinks it prudent to lie about me, defame me and make me look like a criminal when really I am the voice for the victims of big corporations, bankruptcy courts, corrupt judge and lawyers and I am the REAL Independent, NOT bought and Paid for Media that tells more of the truth than David Carr dare to.
David Carr of the New York Times is weak and rely's on bad information and his own Ego to write his stories and posts no proof of documents or "Reality". Do NOT ever Trust a Story from Dave Carr - David Carr of the New York Times.
Dipshit David Carr lied about the WRONG Investigative Blogger. And now the Obsidian V. Cox LIES and blathers of David Carr of the New York Times will be his Online Legacy.
David Carr of the New York Times answers to Big Media and David Carr of the New York Times does not tell you the truth, the whole TRUTH and Nothing But. David Carr of the New York Times uses his power to ruin lives instead of truly investigate stories and make the world a better place for the greater good. David Carr of the New York Times lies about me, defamed me, trash talked me and FAILED to investigate the document proof of my 3 year old story. I will EXPOSE every indiscrestion of David Carr of the New York Times, every late night romp, every video and document I receive, every secret that David Carr of the New York Times wants to hide, I will make sure that this information is found in the search engines.
Got a David Carr of the New York Times story, video, or any information .. DIRT on David Carr of the New York Times ? Email it to Me, I am Blogger Crystal Cox and I will EXPOSE David Carr no matter what, even if the Liars, Thugs and Thieves murder me, I still have bloggers in place to take over where I leave off and EXPOSE every dirty trick, dirty deed, perverted thought, illegal action, and well pretty much EVERY Single Thing regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
Defame Me, Lie About Me, Discredit me to my family, friends, and the world and the truth is I give voice to victims, expose whitewashing for elite law firms, expose bankruptcy courts, expose judges and those who create victims and David Carr of the New York Times sides with the wall of corruption and without investigative any documents of evidence.
Research links on documented Proof of Corruption involving Intel Corp., Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Foley and Lardner Law Firm including Michael Grebe, USPTO Corruption, New York Court Corruption, Warner Bros. Corruption, Lockheed Martin Corruption, CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, CEO Paul Otellini, MPEG LA and more tech companies, media companies, and law firms as well as US courts in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology ~ the iViewit Technology.
David Carr of the New York Times cannot read and his brain was gone long ago with all the Cocaine he snorted, so you will have to research the stories yourself, instead of simply believing me bad, wrong, defaming or in some way harming the innocent. Think for Yourself and DO NOT believe David Carr of the New York Times.
Over 1200 documents of Proof and Dumb Ass David Carr of the New York Times simply states that Blogger Crystal Cox is defaming and there you have it, no research, no documents linked or proven just the word of a cocaine head, woman hating, blogger hating "alleged" journalist ...
Do your Homework.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
http://www.douglaschey.com/
David Carr of the New York Times flat out lies to protect Elite Lawyers, New York Corruption, and Big Media. David Carr is part of the PROBLEM and not the SOLUTION in the Culture of Corruption.
Got a Dipshit David Carr Tip, Email your David Carr tip to investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox - Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
EXPOSE David Carr of the New York Times - I am Dedicated to exposing David Carr of the New York Times, please email me your tips regarding David Carr of the New York Times.
David Carr of the New York Times has made and ENEMY for Life, in Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, by not bothering to Investigate a story and ruining lives with total disregard for the facts of the matter, and with complete lack of accountability.
David Carr of the New York Times is an asshole, indeed and David Carr of the New York Times has the power to of big Corrupt Media behind him with total disregard for the public at large and bringing down the wall of corruption in the US court system that protects big corporations, elite lawyers and liars like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group.
Do your Homework, Think For Yourself, Believe NO One.
READ, Study, find the TRUTH for yourself.
NEVER listen to David Carr of the New York Times.
NEVER listen to David Carr of the New York Times.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie ~ Free Choice of Medical Science. You have a Right to KNOWN Cures. Fight Back. ~ Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie - "Why Aren't Cures Readily Available?"
Free Enterprise is not really available in the "Medical Industry". They have killed off all competition. It is not about FREE Medicine, Free Health Insurance, it is about letting YOU know about known cures and you educating yourself and demanding that the FDA stop hiding real nutritional information from you. Dead Doctor's Don't Lie Folks, learn all you can about real nutrition.
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Free Enterprise is not really available in the "Medical Industry". They have killed off all competition. It is not about FREE Medicine, Free Health Insurance, it is about letting YOU know about known cures and you educating yourself and demanding that the FDA stop hiding real nutritional information from you. Dead Doctor's Don't Lie Folks, learn all you can about real nutrition.
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie. Information on Dead Doctor's Don't Lie and Cancer. Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie, Dr. Joel Wallach ~ Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie ~ "2. Cancer.
When doctors get information on Cancer, you would think they would photocopy that when they send you that bill, instead of threatening you with collection agencies, they should send you some of the photocopies of this stuff.
In September, 1993, the National Cancer Institute, not the National Enquirer, and the Harvard Medical School in Boston did a study on Cancer patients, and they came out and said an anti-cancer diet was found. When the National Cancer Institute sent that information to your doctor, he leaned back in his chair, wadded it up and did one of those things, right in the waste can. He's real good at throwing that stuff in there. The only thing he reads is, "Oh, I get gold golf clubs if I sell 20 prescriptions of Prozac per month."
They picked China to do their study, because in one province, Henon Province in China, they have the highest rate of Cancer in the whole world. They took 29,000 people for 5 years in this study, and what they did is give them different vitamins and minerals at double the daily recommended allowance for Americans. Now that's a trivial amount.
For instance, they use vitamin C for one group, and the RDA recommended daily allowance for vitamin C is 60 mg, double that to be 120 mg, you can't go into a health food store and get a tablet or capsule for less than 500 mg for an adult. And of course Lynus Pauling, the gentlemen with 2 Nobel Prizes, says if you want to prevent and treat Cancer with vitamin C you have to use 10,000 mg a day.
All the doctors who used to argue with him 35 years ago are all dead, and today Lynus Pauling, still 94, works 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, in his ranch in the Big Sur in California, and teaches at the University of California, San Francisco. So you have to make up your choice whether to listen to the dead doctors or Lynus Pauling. Your choice.
Vitamin C, doubled the RDA, nothing happened. Vitamin A, doubled the RDA, nothing happened. Zinc, Riboflavin, the trace mineral Millevdinum, Niacin, nothing happened. In one group they had a major benefit. In this group they got 3 nutrients at one time. They got vitamin E, they got Beta Carotene, and the trace mineral Selenium. Those 3 were double the RDA. (If you get a half percent benefit in any nutritional or pharmaceutical experiment, you have made a major improvement in humanity's life. So these articles get published. I want you to remember that statistic. Half a percent is major benefit).
In this group that received the 3 for 5 years, deaths from all causes were reduced 9 percent. Almost 10 out of every hundred, or 1 out of every 10 who were going to die in that 5 years, survived. Then Cancers, all Cancers, 13% survived who would have died without those 3 nutrients. So 13 out of 100 lived who would have died, and then the type of Cancer that was the most prevalent in the Henon Province, stomach and esophageal Cancer, 21% lived who would have died. 21 out of 100 lived!
Now these are significant numbers, and your physician should have sent every one of you a photocopy of that. At least given you the information, even if he didn't want to give you the advice, given you the information and let you make up your own mind."
Source of Dead Doctor's Don't Lie quote
http://www.kinmaker.net/DeadDoctorstxt.html#2. Cancer.
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie ~ Do your Homework. Knowledge is Power. Cancer has been Curable for a VERY Long Time. And it seems that Cancer Was always Curable. Check the Dead Doctor's Don't Lie information.
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie ~ "2. Cancer.
When doctors get information on Cancer, you would think they would photocopy that when they send you that bill, instead of threatening you with collection agencies, they should send you some of the photocopies of this stuff.
In September, 1993, the National Cancer Institute, not the National Enquirer, and the Harvard Medical School in Boston did a study on Cancer patients, and they came out and said an anti-cancer diet was found. When the National Cancer Institute sent that information to your doctor, he leaned back in his chair, wadded it up and did one of those things, right in the waste can. He's real good at throwing that stuff in there. The only thing he reads is, "Oh, I get gold golf clubs if I sell 20 prescriptions of Prozac per month."
They picked China to do their study, because in one province, Henon Province in China, they have the highest rate of Cancer in the whole world. They took 29,000 people for 5 years in this study, and what they did is give them different vitamins and minerals at double the daily recommended allowance for Americans. Now that's a trivial amount.
For instance, they use vitamin C for one group, and the RDA recommended daily allowance for vitamin C is 60 mg, double that to be 120 mg, you can't go into a health food store and get a tablet or capsule for less than 500 mg for an adult. And of course Lynus Pauling, the gentlemen with 2 Nobel Prizes, says if you want to prevent and treat Cancer with vitamin C you have to use 10,000 mg a day.
All the doctors who used to argue with him 35 years ago are all dead, and today Lynus Pauling, still 94, works 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, in his ranch in the Big Sur in California, and teaches at the University of California, San Francisco. So you have to make up your choice whether to listen to the dead doctors or Lynus Pauling. Your choice.
Vitamin C, doubled the RDA, nothing happened. Vitamin A, doubled the RDA, nothing happened. Zinc, Riboflavin, the trace mineral Millevdinum, Niacin, nothing happened. In one group they had a major benefit. In this group they got 3 nutrients at one time. They got vitamin E, they got Beta Carotene, and the trace mineral Selenium. Those 3 were double the RDA. (If you get a half percent benefit in any nutritional or pharmaceutical experiment, you have made a major improvement in humanity's life. So these articles get published. I want you to remember that statistic. Half a percent is major benefit).
In this group that received the 3 for 5 years, deaths from all causes were reduced 9 percent. Almost 10 out of every hundred, or 1 out of every 10 who were going to die in that 5 years, survived. Then Cancers, all Cancers, 13% survived who would have died without those 3 nutrients. So 13 out of 100 lived who would have died, and then the type of Cancer that was the most prevalent in the Henon Province, stomach and esophageal Cancer, 21% lived who would have died. 21 out of 100 lived!
Now these are significant numbers, and your physician should have sent every one of you a photocopy of that. At least given you the information, even if he didn't want to give you the advice, given you the information and let you make up your own mind."
Source of Dead Doctor's Don't Lie quote
http://www.kinmaker.net/DeadDoctorstxt.html#2. Cancer.
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie ~ Do your Homework. Knowledge is Power. Cancer has been Curable for a VERY Long Time. And it seems that Cancer Was always Curable. Check the Dead Doctor's Don't Lie information.
Dead Doctor's Don't Lie
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
RSS Feed (xml)
